CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6] — Page 325

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Series Prev Next

نیم

321

Claimants

Wo; the Crom or the

The Chief Justice

delay That we ord danding with is bethan a certain de-

cision 12.0 a correct decision.

12. Glede proce-dɔd to argue that the Ordinance under

vilch the doch and obtained loare to appeal did not con-

thin ang suformce to purchasers from original claimants,

on dich point thuir position #brelutely unaffected

by Un. Ordinanon, the Oldinance indeed was an attempt on

the part of the Goverment to get behind a honest, open

speculation in land m de by his clients two years ago,

and Vithout paying compencation. T. & the Court had to

decide was not the question whether the Land Court ad-

judged right of the facte before them, but who was on-

talled to this lid.

The Puise Judgo

The Chief Surtice

Wo sro not going to do that.

It is an orpoal ageinet a deci-

cion.

Mr.folde I aph it it dut I ang to the subject-

matter of a cube,

The Attorney General in hie reply stated that his

friend minconceived his position, end that cheir Lord-

ships would be travelling out of their proper course if

they were to put his cliente in on respondents. At the

time the case was before the and Court tuge persons

did not cxiut, so that civir presence in the land Court

XXXH vas not neccusay at 611. Therefore they could not

be parling in an uppoud egalnet a docision of the Land

Couch. Way the delay, till within a fow drys of the date

fixed by the Court for the hearing of the enso, in apply-

ing for tauno men to be made ruspondentn? There vos ab-

solutely no answer to his Lordships qucation. To (the

Attorney General) was n ́t oven permitted by the law so

accode to this a plication being guantod.. Mis friend had

Edit History

2026-06-04 11:05:53 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

1 1 نیم 321 Claimants Wo; the Crom or the The Chief Justice delay That we ord danding with is bethan a certain de- cision 12.0 a correct decision. 12. Glede proce-dɔd to argue that the Ordinance under vilch the doch and obtained loare to appeal did not con- thin ang suformce to purchasers from original claimants, on dich point thuir position #brelutely unaffected by Un. Ordinanon, the Oldinance indeed was an attempt on the part of the Goverment to get behind a honest, open speculation in land m de by his clients two years ago, and Vithout paying compencation. T. & the Court had to decide was not the question whether the Land Court ad- judged right of the facte before them, but who was on- talled to this lid. The Puise Judgo The Chief Surtice Wo sro not going to do that. It is an orpoal ageinet a deci- cion. Mr.folde I aph it it dut I ang to the subject- matter of a cube, The Attorney General in hie reply stated that his friend minconceived his position, end that cheir Lord- ships would be travelling out of their proper course if they were to put his cliente in on respondents. At the time the case was before the and Court tuge persons did not cxiut, so that civir presence in the land Court XXXH vas not neccusay at 611. Therefore they could not be parling in an uppoud egalnet a docision of the Land Couch. Way the delay, till within a fow drys of the date fixed by the Court for the hearing of the enso, in apply- ing for tauno men to be made ruspondentn? There vos ab- solutely no answer to his Lordships qucation. To (the Attorney General) was n ́t oven permitted by the law so accode to this a plication being guantod.. Mis friend had 5.

Baseline (Original)

1 1 نیم 321 Claimants Wo; the Crom or the The Chior Justice detay That ve ord danding with is bethan a certain de- cision 12.0 a correct decision. 12. Glede proce-dɔd to argue that the Ordinance under vilch the doch and obtained loare to appeal did not con- thin ang suformce to purchasers from original claimants, on dich point thuir position #brelutely unaffected by Un. Ordinanon, the Oldinance indeed was an attempt on the part of the Goverment to get behind a honest, open speculation in land m de by his clients two years ago, and Vithout paying compencation. T. & the Court had to decide was not the question whether the Land Court ad- judged right of the facte before them, but who was on- talled to this lid. ง The Puise Judgo The Chief Surtice Wo sro not going to do that. It is an orpoal ageinet a deci- cion. Mr.folde I aph it it dut I ang to the subject- matter of a cube, The Attorney General in hie reply stated that his friend minconceived his position, end that cheir Lord- ships would be travelling out of their proper course if they were to put his cliente in on respondents. At the time the case was before the and Court tuge persons did not cxiut, so that civir presence in the land Court XXXH vas not neccusay at 611. Therefore they could not be parling in an uppoud egalnet a docision of the Land Couch. Way the delay, till within a fow drys of the date fixed by the Court for the hearing of the enso, in apply- ing for tauno men to be made ruspondentn? There vos ab- solutely no answer to his Lordships qucation. To (the Attorney General) was n ́t oven permitted by the law so accode to this a plication being guantod.. Mis friend had 5.

2026-06-04 11:05:53 · Baseline

View content

نیم

321